Entities in Second Life are generally referred to as Avatars – ‘avi’s for short. The word comes from the Sanskrit and is the name for the incarnation of a god. A pretty good name for us, I would think. Except in many senses we have more power than the ‘gods’ we are incarnations of, back in RL (Real Life or First Life).
Talking to people around SL you find a lot of attitudes among avatars about what the relationship actually is between SL and RL. Some regard them as completely separate; some don’t think of RL as even existing, while others think of SL solely as a game.
An interesting pointer to this is what we call the ‘gods’ who created us here in SL. Fairly early on, a friend mentioned to me that she refers to the RL entity that created her as ‘her Real Life Avatar’, which is rather neat.
However, I heard a better one the other day, which I am definitely adopting. My awesome mentor and friend Van refers to ‘her Mundane’. The reference is excellent – the word comes from the Latin mundus, the World. Just right, really. But I had heard the reference before and it took me a few minutes to twig. Then it hit me.
The term Mundane, applied to a person, comes from the Xanth series of books by SF writer Piers Anthony – a Brit who has lived in Florida for decades. ‘My Mundane’ has been a fan of Anthony’s writing ever since reading an early work of his, Macroscope, many years ago.
Xanth is a world of magic, where all manner of magical plants and animals exist and everyone has a magical talent of some kind. It’s also a land of atrocious puns – these days many of which are supplied by readers. There are gateways from Xanth into the Mundane world – mainly in Florida it appears – and indeed, dwellers there are referred to as Mundanes. In some cases Xanth residents have Mundane counterparts. Xanth and the Mundane world are otherwise quite separate: they don’t overlay or interpenetrate each other, like the universe of Harry Potter for example. It’s more like Lyra’s world in the books by Philip Pullman, but Lyra doesn’t have an equivalent word to ‘Mundanes’.
We might think the term derogatory, and I suppose it is – a little bit. But… well, Mundanes don’t have the powers and abilities we have, although they are perhaps a bit more careful than we are in some areas (like relationships – something I should talk about some time). However although one meaning of the word mundane is “commonplace” or “ordinary”, that’s not the #1 dictionary definition, which is rather better: “Of, relating to, or typical of this world”.
Very appropriate, don’t you think? My Mundane agrees. But then, he’s pretty much as well-read as I am.









